From Tel Aviv to Tottenham: How Patrick van Leeuwen Built an Academy in the Image of Europe

In the quiet corners of Kiryat Shalom, far from the glare of Premier League floodlights, Patrick van Leeuwen has been constructing something that looks remarkably like the future: a youth academy shaped by Dutch rigour, Eastern European resilience and the restless ambition of clubs from London to Liverpool.

By Eleanor VancePublished Feb 2, 2019, 10:00 AMUpdated Dec 2, 2025, 11:55 AM
Patrick van Leeuwen

Patrick van Leeuwen

A Dutch architect far from home

Patrick van Leeuwen’s story begins not under the Kop or the Stretford End, but on the modest pitches of Sparta Rotterdam, where injuries nudged him from promising professional into precocious coach by the age of 21. His apprenticeship at Feyenoord and later at Shakhtar Donetsk exposed him to academies that think in decades, not seasons, and to a way of working that treats youth development as a culture rather than a department.


When Maccabi Tel Aviv invited him to Israel, he arrived not as a star name but as a quiet ideologue, armed with an A licence and a head full of ideas about structure, discipline and long‑term planning that would not look out of place at Manchester City’s Etihad Campus or Liverpool’s AXA Training Centre.


Discipline as a philosophy

Van Leeuwen speaks about discipline not as punishment but as a shared language, the grammar without which no style can exist. From eight-year-olds to young professionals on the cusp of the first team, every player at Maccabi Tel Aviv is expected to understand when to arrive, how to train, how to behave, and how to fold football around school, army service and family life.


The insistence on rules feels strikingly familiar to anyone who has watched academy graduates emerge seamlessly at Arsenal or Chelsea : players schooled not only in technique but in habits, punctuality and tactical obedience, so that when the moment comes under the lights, the game feels like an extension of their daily routine rather than a rupture.


Building a pathway, not a promise

What van Leeuwen has tried to create in Tel Aviv is something English football once lacked and now fiercely protects: a pathway from playground to professional that does not depend on a single spectacular season. He argues that children of eight should wander through positions, tasting full‑back as well as winger, centre‑back as well as number ten, so that by fourteen their game has breadth as well as flair.


At nineteen or twenty, his ideal is a “B” team in the second division, a bridge that allows young players to live in the club’s culture while playing serious football – a concept instantly recognisable to followers of Manchester City’s tie‑ins or the carefully managed loans of Chelsea and Brighton. The aim is not to win youth titles but to see six to eight academy players genuinely competing for first‑team places, just as supporters of Liverpool or Newcastle now look at the bench and see the club’s future sitting there, waiting.


Talent, mentality and the weight of expectation

In van Leeuwen’s telling, Israeli youngsters are technically gifted but sometimes betrayed by a lack of tactical schooling and by the volatile structures of their leagues. He is fascinated by mentality – by what happens to a player when he tires, when he is substituted, when a nation calls him “the next great hope” before he has truly grown into his own name.


To that end, his academy leans on mental coaches, media education and the hard lessons of dense tournaments where five matches in three days expose every weakness of concentration. It is an approach that echoes the quiet revolution in England, where clubs like Tottenham Hotspur and Manchester United now marry sports psychology with data and video analysis, trying to ensure that a teenager’s first visit to a heaving Premier League stadium does not feel like landing on another planet.


Parents, politics and protecting the academy

No academy lives in a vacuum, and van Leeuwen is candid about the complications: parents who want to negotiate tactics, rules that allow fifteen‑year‑olds to walk away for nothing, and clubs that hesitate to invest in youth when they cannot be sure of retaining the rewards. His solution is radical in its simplicity – transparency with families, early identification of talent, and a structure that binds seven‑ and eight‑year‑olds to a clear philosophy long before football becomes “a business”.


In this sense, his concerns mirror those voiced in England whenever a gifted teenager is tempted abroad or down the pyramid: the fear that years of care at clubs like West Ham United or Southampton might be lost to short‑term decisions, and that development systems must be protected if they are to survive the financial storms of the modern game.


Goalkeepers, late bloomers and the beautiful uncertainty

For all his emphasis on systems, van Leeuwen remains tender about the fragility of individual careers. He talks about goalkeepers whose trajectories were interrupted by injuries, about prodigies like Eden Kartzev who wore the heavy cloak of being “the next big thing” before they had fully grown into their own shoulders.


His response is to return, again and again, to patience and context: to keepers taught to play with their feet in the Dutch mould, to forwards reminded that movement off the ball is as beautiful as the shot that ends up in the net. It is the same delicate balance that English clubs now try to strike when nurturing the likes of Cole Palmer or Kobbie Mainoo – protecting them from the glare while trusting them early enough that their talent is not dulled by caution.


A philosophy beyond one man

Perhaps the most striking element in van Leeuwen’s vision is his refusal to make himself the protagonist. He insists that a true academy philosophy must outlive the architect, just as the identities of Ajax, Feyenoord or Barcelona survived and evolved beyond the coaches who first defined them.


At Maccabi Tel Aviv, he has surrounded himself with former players turned novice coaches, men learning to translate their memories on the pitch into sessions on the training ground. In England, one can see the same instinct in the increasing presence of club legends and long‑serving staff within academy setups at places like Liverpool, Manchester City and Newcastle United, where continuity is treated as a competitive advantage rather than a sentimental luxury.


From Tel Aviv to the terraces of England

If there is a quiet romance in van Leeuwen’s work, it lies in his belief that an academy is a promise to the future: that an owner’s investment can one day be repaid not only in transfer fees, but in the sight of homegrown players walking out to an anthem and a sea of scarves. In Tel Aviv, he dreams of facilities that match the ambition, of a structure that might, over decades, echo the industrial elegance of Kirkby, Hotspur Way or Cobham.


And all across England, from the thunder of Anfield and Old Trafford to the rising noise at the Emirates, the Etihad, Stamford Bridge, St James’ Park and the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, supporters know that somewhere behind the main stand there is always a smaller pitch, a quieter crowd, and a coach like Patrick van Leeuwen trying to shape the next generation in the image of the beautiful game they love.

Related Teams, Competitions & Players

Category: News
EV
Eleanor Vance

A literature graduate, Eleanor views football as human theater. She writes long-read features for the Sunday papers. She is interested in club history, player psychology, and stadium atmosphere. Her vocabulary is rich and her descriptions evocative. She seeks the beauty and melancholy within the sport.